Welcome to DorschEdit.ca.

You appear to be using obsolete Web browsing software, possibly Netscape 4. Although you can explore this site with your browser, some things will look a bit funny.

To get the most out of this site, you will need a Web browser that supports modern standards. Internet Explorer isn't too bad, but it only partly supports Web standards. It's therefore very difficult to build good Web pages that everyone can use.

The best browsers for Windows are Mozilla and Netscape. Mac users should get Safari, Camino, Mozilla or OmniWeb.

Dorsch Editorial logo
Your source for editorial excellence

About Dorsch Editorial

Types of Editing

Manuscript Critique/Evaluation

It includes one read-through of the entire manuscript. I prepare two to six pages of written comment on substantive issues, noting strengths and weaknesses and offering suggestions for improvement. I do a copyedit of part of a chapter to give an idea of the type of copyediting details the writer needs to give attention to.

A critique deals with such aspects as structure, organization, substantiation, research, gaps in logic, repetition, flow, suitability to audience, clarity, plot, dialogue, characterization, description, setting, point of view, chronology, pace, etc. Those aspects vary, of course, according to whether the manuscript is fiction or non-fiction.

A critique is an overview to give the author an idea of whether the manuscript is essentially ready for publication or needs significant revision, and whether the revisions are such that the author could handle them or a professional edit would be advisable.

Substantive editing

Substantive editing covers much the same "big picture" issues as a critique, but it gets into serious, focused work on revision in consultation with the author. The nature of this consultation varies from author to author. Some of the ways it has worked:

I do substantive editing only on screen, not on hard copy. If a manuscript requires a substantive edit, that should be done before a copyedit.


Copyediting tackles the manuscript line by line, paying attention to the small details: grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, passive voice, word choice, consistency of detail, spelling, consistency of style, clarity, etc.

As I work through the manuscript I prepare a style sheet, which keeps track of such stylistic decisions as whether the author prefers to use serial commas, capitalize pronouns for deity, etc. so that I can be sure to be consistent. I usually perform at least two passes through the manuscript.

I copyedit on screen, not on hard copy. Using the "track changes" function gives the author a ready view of the changes. In notes I can provide as little or as much explanation of my changes as the author desires.


Proofreading is the final editorial task performed on a publication before printing. It is done on the pages after layout, when they are ready to go to press. Because this is a final stage and an editorial change can cause a ripple effect throughout the flow of the document, proofreading looks only for right/wrong details (e.g. misspellings, page numbers out of order, etc.), not for things that simply could be improved (e.g. using a stronger verb, clarifying an ambiguous phrase).

Proofreading focuses on two types of problems:
a) details that have been missed in the editing stages, such as spelling, punctuation, stylistic and serious grammatical errors
b) glitches that have been introduced during layout, such as errors in headers/footers, page numbers, widows/orphans, bad hyphen breaks at line ends, etc.

Dorsch Editorial
90 Ling Road, PH302
Toronto, ON  M1E 4Y3
phone: 416-439-4320
e-mail: audrey@dorschedit.ca